<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stamford Advocate Website Steps Up Web Media, Bans StationStops.com From Comments (?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stationstops.com/2008/04/23/stamford-advocate-website-steps-up-web-media-bans-stationstopscom-from-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stationstops.com/2008/04/23/stamford-advocate-website-steps-up-web-media-bans-stationstopscom-from-comments/</link>
	<description>Metro-North Train Schedules and NYC Commuting Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:39:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kylej</title>
		<link>http://www.stationstops.com/2008/04/23/stamford-advocate-website-steps-up-web-media-bans-stationstopscom-from-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>kylej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stationstops.com/?p=333#comment-713</guid>
		<description>while I sympathize with online newspapers requiring more ads to pay the bills, I agree that the hospital ad is obnoxious, and the &#039;close&#039; box is hidden way up by the search box. I wish there was a way to see how many people actually click on those ads intentionally (I&#039;m betting most are accidental). 

And your point about publishing pictures of wanted persons is spot on, it should not be a business decision. Even if it has to be a business decision, the Advocate could take credit if a suspect is found when someone saw a photo on their website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while I sympathize with online newspapers requiring more ads to pay the bills, I agree that the hospital ad is obnoxious, and the &#8216;close&#8217; box is hidden way up by the search box. I wish there was a way to see how many people actually click on those ads intentionally (I&#8217;m betting most are accidental). </p>
<p>And your point about publishing pictures of wanted persons is spot on, it should not be a business decision. Even if it has to be a business decision, the Advocate could take credit if a suspect is found when someone saw a photo on their website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

